Enhancement of Digital Credit Scoring in P2P Lending using a Robust Hybrid Voting–Stacking Ensemble Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47654/v30y2026i3p145-183Keywords:
Ensemble modeling, Machine learning, P2P lending, Credit Scoring, Stacking, FintechAbstract
Purpose - This study evaluates a hybrid ensemble framework designed to enhance credit-risk prediction accuracy in peer-to-peer (P2P) digital lending platforms and to overcome the limitations of existing models.
Design/methodology/approach – The proposed Hybrid Optimized Ensemble Learning (HOEL) framework integrates seven base classifiers through a three-level optimization process that involves K-fold cross-validation, hyperparameter tuning, an intermediate weighted-voting ensemble layer, and a final stacking meta-learner.
Findings - Empirical results demonstrate that the HOEL framework outperforms individual classifiers, achieving an ROC-AUC of 97.62% and an accuracy of 96.15%. The ensemble’s layered design improves predictive stability and interpretability, confirming its robustness across small and high-dimensional datasets.
Research limitations - Although computationally intensive, the framework’s performance can be further optimized using cloud-based or parallel processing. Future studies could incorporate additional behavioral features to improve model generalization.
Practical implications - The framework can be integrated into a trusted P2P digital lending platform to improve loan-approval decisions for customers with limited credit history, thereby reducing lending risks.
Originality/value - HOEL's novelty resides in its three-level optimization architecture, which embeds an intermediate weighted-voting layer that stabilizes ensemble predictions before they are passed to a stacking meta-learner. This combination has not previously been applied to imbalanced P2P credit risk scoring and delivers measurable gains in both ROC–AUC and accuracy over conventional ensemble approaches. The voting layer reduces hyperparameter sensitivity and strengthens stacking stability, making the framework particularly effective for small and high-dimensional financial datasets. This study thereby advances the Decision Sciences literature on quantitative risk modeling by providing a replicable, data-driven credit-assessment framework that supports more informed financial decision-making under uncertainty.
References
Abbasi, K., Alam, A., Brohi, N. A., Brohi, I. A., & Nasim, S. (2021). P2P lending fintechs and SMEs’ access to finance. Economics Letters, 204, 109890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109890
Abedin, M. Z., Guotai, C., Hajek, P., & Zhang, T. (2022). Combining weighted SMOTE with ensemble learning for the class-imbalanced prediction of small business credit risk. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 9(4), 3559–3579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00614-4
Aleksandrova, Y. (2021). Comparing performance of machine learning algorithms for default risk prediction in peer-to-peer lending. TEM Journal, 10(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem101-16
Bone-Winkel, G. F., & Reichenbach, F. (2024). Improving credit risk assessment in P2P lending with explainable machine learning survival analysis. Digital Finance https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-024-00114-3
Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018054314350
Chang, A.-H., Yang, L.-K., Tsaih, R.-H., & Lin, S.-K. (2022). Machine learning and artificial neural networks to construct P2P lending credit-scoring model: A case using Lending Club data. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 6(2), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.3934/qfe.2022013
Chang, C. L., McAleer, M., & Wong, W. K. (2018). Editorial statement of intent for Advances in Decision Sciences (ADS): 22nd anniversary special issue in 2018 (No. EI2018-40). Advances in Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.47654/v22y2018iSIp1-2
Cheng, Y., Hui, Y., McAleer, M., & Wong, W. K. (2021). Spurious relationships for nearly non-stationary series. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(8), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14080366
Coakley, J., & Huang, W. (2020). P2P lending and outside entrepreneurial finance. The European Journal of Finance, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847x.2020.1842223
Cont, R. (2001). Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantitative Finance, 1(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/713665670
Coşkun, S. B., & Turanli, M. (2023). Credit risk analysis using boosting methods. Journal of Applied Mathematics, Statistics and Informatics, 19(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/jamsi-2023-0001
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348
Dietterich, T. G. (2000). Ensemble methods in machine learning. In J. Kittler & F. Roli (Eds.), Multiple classifier systems: First International Workshop, MCS 2000 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1857, pp. 1–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1
Duarte, J., Siegel, S., & Young, L. A. (2023). The evolution of P2P lending. SSRN Electronic Journal https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4476944
Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1950). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. I. Biometrika, 37(3–4), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/37.3-4.409
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1997.1504
Hamori, S., & Kume, T. (2018). Artificial intelligence and economic growth. Advances in Decision Sciences, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.47654/v22y2018i1p1-22
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7
Hui, Y., Shi, M., Wong, W. K., & Zheng, S. (2024). Pragmatic attitude to large-scale Markowitz’s portfolio optimization and factor-augmented derating. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, 103628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103628
Hui, Y., Wong, W. K., Bai, Z., & Zhu, Z. (2017). A new nonlinearity test to circumvent the limitation of Volterra expansion with application. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 46(3), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2016.11.006
Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters, 6(3), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(80)90024-5
Jayaram, E. S. (2024). Leveraging machine learning techniques for developing robust credit scores for peer-to-peer lending platforms. Kuwait Journal of Science, 30(5), 12958–12966. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.5633
Kaggle. (2024). Credit risk dataset: Your machine learning and data science community https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/laotse/credit-risk-dataset/data
Kokate, S., & Chetty, M. S. (2021). Credit risk assessment of loan defaulters in commercial banks using voting classifier ensemble learner machine learning model. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 11(5), 565–572. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.110508
Laborda, J., & Ryoo, S. (2021). Feature selection in a credit scoring model. Mathematics, 9(7), 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070746
Lenka, S. R., Bisoy, S. K., & Priyadarshini, R. (2024). Multiple optimized ensemble learning for high-dimensional imbalanced credit scoring datasets. Knowledge and Information Systems, 66(9), 5429–5457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02129-z
Li, Z., Hui, Y., Wong, W. K., & Lin, R. (2025). Portfolio selection based on mean-generalized variance analysis: Evidence from the G20 stock markets. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 42(3), 2450016. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021759592450016X
Madaan, M., Kumar, A., Keshri, C., Jain, R., & Nagrath, P. (2021). Loan default prediction using decision trees and random forest: A comparative study. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1022(1), 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1022/1/012042
Meshref, H. (2020). Predicting loan approval of bank direct marketing data using ensemble machine learning algorithms. International Journal of Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, 14, 914–922. https://doi.org/10.46300/9106.2020.14.117
Munsarif, M., Sam’an, M., & Safuan, S. (2022). Peer-to-peer lending risk analysis based on embedded technique and stacking ensemble learning. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 11(6), 3483–3489. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v11i6.3927
Naidu, G., Zuva, T., & Sibanda, E. M. (2023). A review of evaluation metrics in machine learning algorithms. In Computer Science Online Conference (pp. 15–25). Cham: Springer International Publishing https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35314-7_2
Najaf, K., Subramaniam, R. K., & Atayah, O. F. (2021). Understanding the implications of FinTech peer-to-peer (P2P) lending during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1917225
Nguyen, L., Ahsan, M., & Haider, J. (2024). Reimagining peer-to-peer lending sustainability: Unveiling predictive insights with innovative machine learning approaches for loan default anticipation. FinTech, 3(1), 184–215. https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech3010012
Noriega, J. P., Rivera, L. A., & Herrera, J. A. (2023). Machine learning for credit risk prediction: A systematic literature review. Preprints https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.0947.v1
O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
Perera, C. L., & Premaratne, S. C. (2023). An ensemble machine learning approach for forecasting credit risk of loan applications. WSEAS Transactions on Systems, 23, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.37394/23202.2024.23.4
Ramsey, J. B. (1969). Tests for specification errors in classical linear least squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 31(2), 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1969.tb00796.x
Schapire, R. E. (1990). The strength of weak learnability. Machine Learning, 5(2), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116037
Shih, D.-H., Wu, T.-W., Shih, P.-Y., Lu, N.-A., & Shih, M.-H. (2022). A framework of global credit-scoring modeling using outlier detection and machine learning in a P2P lending platform. Mathematics, 10(13), 2282. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10132282
Trinh, L. T. (2024). A comparative analysis of consumer credit risk models in peer-to-peer lending. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 29(57), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/jefas-04-2021-0026
Uddin, N., Ahamed, M. K., Uddin, M. A., Islam, M. M., & Aryal, S. (2023). An ensemble machine learning based bank loan approval predictions system with a smart application. SSRN Electronic Journal https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4376481
Verified Market Research. (2024, December). Peer to peer (P2P) lending market by business model (traditional P2P platforms, marketplace lending, blockchain-based P2P lending), loan type (personal loans, business loans, student loans, real estate loans, auto loans), & region for 2024 to 2031 [Market research report]. https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/peer-to-peer-p2p-lending-market/
Wattanakitrungroj, N., Wijitkajee, P., Jaiyen, S., Sathapornvajana, S., & Tongman, S. (2024). Enhancing supervised model performance in credit risk classification using sampling strategies and feature ranking. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 8(3), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8030028
Wei, Y., Kirkulak-Uludag, B., Zhu, D., & Zhou, Z. (2023). Stacking ensemble method for personal credit risk assessment in P2P lending. SSRN Electronic Journal https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4318348
Wolpert, D. H. (1992). Stacked generalization. Neural Networks, 5(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80023-1
Wong, W. K., Cheng, Y., & Yue, M. (2024). Could regression of stationary series be spurious? Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217595924400177
Wong, W. K., & Pham, M. T. (2022a). Could the test from the standard regression model make significant regression with autoregressive noise become insignificant? A note. The International Journal of Finance, 34(1), 1–18. https://tijof.scibiz.world/ijof-2022_01
Wong, W. K., & Pham, M. T. (2022b). Could the test from the standard regression model make significant regression with autoregressive noise become insignificant? A note. The International Journal of Finance, 34, 19–39.
Wong, W. K., & Yue, M. (2024). Could regressing a stationary series on a non-stationary series obtain meaningful outcomes? Annals of Financial Economics, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010495224500118
Yang, L., & Shami, A. (2020). On hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms: Theory and practice. Neurocomputing, 415, 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.08.013
Yang, R. (2024). Machine learning-based loan default prediction in peer-to-peer lending. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 94, 310–318. https://doi.org/10.54097/qdjd8r65
Yeh, J.-Y., Chiu, H.-Y., & Huang, J.-H. (2024). Predicting failure of P2P lending platforms through machine learning: The case in China. Finance Research Letters, 59, 104784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104784
Zhang, T., & Sun, W. (2023). Research on online loan default prediction model based on ensemble learning. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mathematical Statistics and Economic Analysis (MSEA 2023) (pp. 26–28). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.26-5-2023.2334378
Zhao, Z., Cui, T., Ding, S., Li, J., & Bellotti, A. G. (2024). Resampling techniques study on class imbalance problem in credit risk prediction. Mathematics, 12(5), 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12050701
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohamed Galal (Corresponding Author); Sherine Rady, Mostafa Aref (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Scientific and Business World