The Impact of Derivatives and CEO Overpower on Bank Risk-Taking Behavior: Evidence from Vietnam

Hoa Thanh Phan Le; Ai Ngoc Nhan Le; Yen Kim Bui; Hoa Kim Thi Vu; Tung Thanh Ho

doi:10.47654/v28y2024i1p1-26

Authors

Hoa Thanh Phan Le Faculty of Accounting and Auditing, Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Author
Ai Ngoc Nhan Le Faculty of Finance and Banking, Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Author
Yen Kim Bui School of Banking, College of Business, University of Economics, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Author
Hoa Kim Thi Vu Faculty of Finance and Banking, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Author
Tung Thanh Ho Faculty of Finance and Banking, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Corresponding Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47654/v28y2024i1p1-26

Keywords:

Derivatives, CEO Overpower, Bank Risk, GMM, Vietnam

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the impact of derivative instrument adoption and CEO overpower on bank risk-taking in Vietnam's emerging banking sector. It addresses a critical gap in the literature concerning how these combined factors influence bank risk profiles within the unique context of a developing financial market characterized by a nascent derivatives market and concentrated CEO influence.

Design/methodology/approach: Employing panel data from 38 Vietnamese commercial banks spanning 2009 to 2020, this research utilizes both Fixed Effect Models (FEM) and dynamic system Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) to analyze the nexus between financial derivatives, CEO overpower (proxied by salary, tenure, and ownership), and bank risk (measured by Z-score).

Findings: The empirical results indicate that increased use of derivatives is associated with reduced bank risk. Furthermore, higher CEO salaries and longer CEO tenures are found to discourage bank risk-taking. Conversely, greater CEO ownership correlates with increased bank risk. These core findings demonstrate robustness when tested with alternative risk proxies.

Research limitations/implications: While enhancing understanding of bank risk in an emerging market, this study is subject to data limitations stemming from the relatively small pool of publicly traded banks in Vietnam. This may affect the generalizability of the findings. Future cross-country analyses could address these constraints. Nevertheless, the study extends Corporate Hedging Theory and Agency Theory by providing empirical evidence from an under-researched transitional economy.

Practical Implications: The findings suggest two key policy directions: first, fostering transparent regulation and financial education to enable the effective use of derivatives for risk mitigation in Vietnam; second, implementing strong governance measures, including calibrated ownership thresholds and risk-aligned compensation and tenure practices, to manage the influence of CEO power on bank risk-taking.

Originality/value: This paper offers novel empirical evidence on the synergistic effects of derivatives and CEO overpower on bank risk within an emerging market. It contributes to decision sciences by providing nuanced insights into the complex decision-making processes, governance structures, and risk management practices pertinent to the banking industry in such economies, particularly where derivative markets are still developing.

References

Acrey, J. C., McCumber, W. R., & Nguyen, T. H. T. (2011). CEO incentives and bank risk. Journal of Economics and Business, 63(5), 456-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2010.09.002

Akbar, S., Kharabsheh, B., Poletti-Hughes, J., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2017). Board structure and corporate risk taking in the UK financial sector. International Review of Financial Analysis, 50, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.02.001

Bansal, R., & Singh, D. (2021). Efficiency drivers of insurers in GCC: an analysis incorporating company-specific and external environmental variables. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1922179. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1922179

Bartram, S. M., Brown, G. W., & Conrad, J. (2011). The effects of derivatives on firm risk and value. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(4), 967-999. https://doi.org /10.1017/S00 22109011000275

Bierth, C., Irresberger, F., & Weiß, G. N. (2015). Systemic risk of insurers around the globe. Journal of Banking & Finance, 55, 232-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.02.014

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Research synthesis methods, 1(2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12

Broll, U., Wong, W. K., & Wu, M. (2011). Banking firm, risk of investment and derivatives. Technology and Investment, 2(3), 222-227. https://doi.org/10.4236/ti.2011.23023

Candradewi, M. R., Wiksuana, I. G. B., Purbawangsa, I. B. A., & Sedana, I. B. P. (2017). Determinants of Derivatives Usage and Its Effect on Firm Risk: Evidence from Indonesian Non-Financial Firms. European Journal of Business and Management, 9, 15. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234627904.pdf

Chang, C. W., Li, X., Lin, E. M., & Yu, M. T. (2018). Systemic risk, interconnectedness, and non-core activities in Taiwan insurance industry. International Review of Economics & Finance, 55, 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.07.014

Chen, Z., & Ebrahim, A. (2018). Turnover threat and CEO risk-taking behavior in the banking industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 96, 87-105. 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.08.007

Cheng, Y., Hui, Y., Liu, S., & Wong, W. K. (2022). Could significant regression be treated as insignificant: An anomaly in statistics?. Communications in Statistics: Case Studies, Data Analysis and Applications, 8(1), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/23737484.2021.1986171

Cheng, Y., Hui, Y., McAleer, M., & Wong, W.-K. (2021). Spurious Relationships for Nearly Non-Stationary Series. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(8), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14080366

Duong, D. K., Phan, T. T. P., Pho, K. H., & McAleer, M. (2020). Impact of board characteristics and state ownership on dividend policy in Vietnam. Advances in decision sciences, (4), 1-34.

Duong, K. D., Tran, P. M. D., & Pham, H. (2023). CEO overpower and corporate social responsibility of commercial banks: The moderating role of state ownership. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 2171609.

Duong, K. D., Y Phung, N. N., Pham, H., & Nhan Le, A. N. (2024). CEO Overpower and Real Earning Manipulation in Family Businesses: Do Ownership Structures Matter?. SAGE Open, 14(3), 21582440241266922.

Fortin, R., Goldberg, G. M., & Roth, G. (2010). Bank risk taking at the onset of the current banking crisis. Financial Review, 45(4), 891-913. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2010.00277.x

Frankel, R., McVay, S., & Soliman, M. (2011). Non-GAAP earnings and board independence. Review of Accounting Studies, 16, 719-744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-011-9166-3

García-Marco, T., & Robles-Fernández, M. D. (2008). Risk-taking behaviour and ownership in the banking industry: The Spanish evidence. Journal of Economics and Business, 60(4), 332-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2007.04.008

Ghosh, A. (2017). How do derivative securities affect bank risk and profitability? Evidence from the US commercial banking industry. The Journal of Risk Finance, 18(2), 186–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-09-2016-0116

Hairston, S. A., & Brooks, M. R. (2019). Derivative accounting and financial reporting quality: A review of the literature. Advances in Accounting, 44, 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2018.10.003

Hamdi, H., Hakimi, A., & Zaghdoudi, K. (2017). Diversification, bank performance and risk: have Tunisian banks adopted the new business model?. Financial Innovation, 3(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-017-0069-6

Huan, X., & Parbonetti, A. (2019). Financial derivatives and bank risk: evidence from eighteen developed markets. Accounting and Business Research, 49(7), 847-874. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2019.1618695

Hui, Y., Wong, W. K., Bai, Z., & Zhu, Z. Z. (2017). A new nonlinearity test to circumvent the limitation of Volterra expansion with application. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 46, 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2016.11.006

Imbierowicz, B., & Rauch, C. (2014). The relationship between liquidity risk and credit risk in banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 40, 242-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.11.030

Khan, M. S., Scheule, H., & Wu, E. (2017). Funding liquidity and bank risk taking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 82, 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.09.005

Laeven, L., Ratnovski, L., & Tong, H. (2016). Bank size, capital, and systemic risk: Some international evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 69, S25-S34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.06.022

Le, A. N. N., Pham, H., Pham, D. T. N., & Duong, K. D. (2023). Political stability and foreign direct investment inflows in 25 Asia-Pacific countries: the moderating role of trade openness. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02075-1

Li, S., & Marinč, M. (2014). The use of financial derivatives and risks of US bank holding companies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 35, 46-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.07.007

Manuel Arellano, Stephen Bond, Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 58, Issue 2, April 1991, Pages 277–297, https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

Marie, M., Kamel, H., & Elbendary, I. (2021). How does internal governance affect banks’ financial stability? Empirical evidence from Egypt. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18, 240-255. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00110-8

Oanh, T. T. K., Van Nguyen, D., Le, H. V., & Duong, K. D. (2023). How capital structure and bank liquidity affect bank performance: Evidence from the Bayesian approach. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), 2260243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2260243

Pathan, S. (2009). Strong boards, CEO power and bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(7), 1340-1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.02.001

Pour, E. K., Uddin, M., Murinde, V., & Amini, S. (2023). CEO Power, Bank Risk-Taking and National Culture: International Evidence. Journal of Financial Stability, 101133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2023.101133

Quaye, E. N. B., Andoh, C., & Aboagye, A. Q. (2014). Loss reserve variability and loss reserve errors: An empirical analysis of the Ghanaian property and liability insurance industry. The Journal of Risk Finance, 15(3), 248-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-03-2014-0018

Sheikh, S. (2019). CEO power and corporate risk: The impact of market competition and corporate governance. Corporate Governance International Review, 27(5), 358–377. https://www.academia.edu/download/86257478/corg.1228520220521-1-zh6f73.pdf

Suu, N. D., Tien, H. T., Pan, S. H., & Wong, W. K. (2023). Impact of foreign ownership and foreign bank presence on liquidity risk: Evidence from Viet Nam. Advances in Decision Sciences, 27(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.47654/v27y2023i1p23-44

Tadele, H., & Kalyebara, B. (2020). CEO power and bank risk in the UAE. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(3), 117. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.11

Titova, Y., Penikas, H., & Gomayun, N. (2020). The impact of hedging and trading derivatives on value, performance and risk of European banks. Empirical Economics, 58(2), 535-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1545-1

Tran, O. K. T., Van Nguyen, D., & Duong, K. D. (2022). How market concentration and liquidity affect non-performing loans: Evidence from Vietnam. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 26(1), 325-337. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2022.26.1.20

Tran, O. T. K., Nguyen, A. H. V., Nguyen, P. Y. N., & Duong, K. D. (2023). CEO overpower and stock price crash risk: Evidence from family businesses in Vietnam. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 10(3), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v10i3.1195

Trang, L. N. T., Nhan, D. T. T., Hao, N. T. N., & Wong, W. K. (2021). Does bank liquidity risk lead to bank's operational efficiency? A study in Vietnam. Advances in Decision Sciences, 25(4), 46-88. https://doi.org/10.47654/v25y2021i4p46-88

Vo, X. V. (2018). Bank lending behavior in emerging markets. Finance Research Letters, 27, 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.02.011

Vuong, G. T. H., & Nguyen, M. H. (2020). Revenue diversification and banking risk: Does the state ownership matter? Evidence from an emerging market. Annals of Financial Economics, 15(04), 2050019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010495220500190

Vuong, G. T. H., Phan, P. T. T., Nguyen, C. X., Nguyen, D. M., & Duong, K. D. (2023). Liquidity creation and bank risk-taking: Evidence from a transition market. Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19141

Wong, W. K., & Pham, M.T. (2025). Could the correlation of a stationary series with a non-stationary series obtain meaningful outcomes?. Annals of Financial Economics, first revision https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010495225500010

Wong, W. K., & Yue, M. (2024). Could regressing a stationary series on a non-stationary series obtain meaningful outcomes?. Annals of Financial Economics, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010495224500118

Wong, W. K., Cheng, Y., & Yue, M. (2024). Could regression of stationary series be spurious?. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1142%2FS0217595924400177

Zhang, H. (2009). Effect of derivative accounting rules on corporate risk-management behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 47(3), 244-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.11.007