Determinants of Reward Crowdfunding Success for Technology Projects: The Moderating Role of Platform Age

Authors

  • Ichrak DRIDI ESC-Business School of Tunis, QuAnLab LR24ES21, Manouba University, Manouba 2010, Tunisia Corresponding Author
  • Oussama Gafrej Laboratoire de Management de l’Innovation et de Développement Durable (LAMIDED), Higher Institute of Commercial Studies, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia Author
  • Jabeur Salhi Laboratoire de Management de l’Innovation et de Développement Durable (LAMIDED), Higher Institute of Management of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47654/v30y2026i2p68-113

Keywords:

Reward-crowdfunding, Technology projects, Crowdfunding success, GLS regression, Quantile regression

Abstract

Purpose: Moving beyond the average effects identified in prior literature, this study investigates the differential drivers of technology crowdfunding success and how platform maturity reshapes the competitive landscape. Specifically, it examines whether strategies ensuring basic viability can secure top-tier success and how key drivers evolve as a platform ages.

Design/methodology/approach: The study analyzes 600 technology projects from Kickstarter (2009-2023) using a complementary analytical approach. Generalized Least Squares regression and subsample analysis establish baseline relationships and test the moderating role of platform age. Quantile regression then uncovers how the influence of key determinants shifts across the entire conditional distribution of campaign success.

Findings: The results confirm the significance of fundamental determinants, with subsample analysis showing their influence is contingent on a project’s final outcome. A key finding is that platform age positively moderates the relationship between media richness and success. Quantile regression further reveals a performance-level hierarchy, showing that influential criteria evolve from establishing baseline viability for lower-performing campaigns to signaling superior credibility and comprehensive development for top performers.

Originality/value: This study advances decision sciences by demonstrating context-dependent crowdfunding strategies and employing quantile regression to reveal a hierarchical decision model, with platform age as a key moderator. In contrast to earlier studies that overlook decision heterogeneity, this research proposes an original quantile regression approach that incorporates platform age as a moderator, enabling a differentiated analysis of reward-based crowdfunding success across performance levels. It identifies the key determinants of success in reward-based crowdfunding, offering a decision-oriented framework to understand how creators’ strategic choices and backers’ responses jointly drive funding outcomes.

Practical implications: For decision sciences in practice, the findings prescribe distinct contingent strategies for creators based on performance targets and platform maturity. They further advocate for platform administrators to develop level-specific decision support systems, moving beyond one-size-fits-all analytics to improve strategic outcomes.

References

Agrawal, A. K., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2011). The geography of crowdfunding (NBER Working Paper No. 16820). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w16820

Ahlers, G. K. C., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955-980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157

Akerlof, G. A. (1978). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. In P. Diamond & M. Rothschild (Eds.), Uncertainty in economics: Readings and exercises (pp. 237-251). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-214850-7.50022-X

Alazazi, M., Wang, B., & Allan, T. (2020). Success Factors of Donation-Based Crowdfunding Campaigns: A Machine Learning Approach. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.306

Alshebami, A. (2022). Crowdfunding platforms as a substitute financing source for young Saudi entrepreneurs. Sage Open, 12(3), 21582440221126511.

Antonenko, P., Lee, B., & Kleinheksel, A. (2014). Trends in the crowdfunding of educational technology startups. TechTrends, 58(6), 36-41.

Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford University Press.

Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015

Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. (2005). The Resource‐based View: Origins and Implications. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management (1st ed., pp. 123-182). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631218616.2006.00006.x

Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003

Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in Social Exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x

Böckel, A., Nuzum, A.-K., & Weissbrod, I. (2021). Blockchain for the Circular Economy: Analysis of the Research-Practice Gap. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 525-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.006

Brabham, D. C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving: An Introduction and Cases. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856507084420

Brown, T. E., Boon, E., & Pitt, L. F. (2017). Seeking funding in order to sell: Crowdfunding as a marketing tool. Business Horizons, 60(2), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.11.004

Burtch, G., Ghose, A., & Wattal, S. (2013). An Empirical Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Contribution Patterns in Crowd-Funded Markets. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 499-519. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0468

Butticè, V., Colombo, M. G., & Wright, M. (2017). Serial Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and Project Success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 183-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12271

Cai, W., Polzin, F., & Stam, E. (2021). Crowdfunding and social capital: A systematic review using a dynamic perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120412

Cheng, Y., Hui, Y., McAleer, M., & Wong, W. K. (2021). Spurious relationships for nearly non-stationary series. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(8), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14080366

Cialdini, R. B., Wosinska, W., Barrett, D. W., Butner, J., & Gornik-Durose, M. (1999). Compliance with a Request in Two Cultures: The Differential Influence of Social Proof and Commitment/Consistency on Collectivists and Individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1242-1253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299258006

Colombo, M. G., Franzoni, C., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). Internal Social Capital and the Attraction of Early Contributions in Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12118

Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2017). Resolving Information Asymmetry: Signaling, Endorsement, and Crowdfunding Success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12267

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X

Das, K., Krzywinski, M., & Altman, N. (2019). Quantile regression. Nature Methods, 16(6), 451-452. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0406-y

Deng, L., Ye, Q., Xu, D., Sun, W., & Jiang, G. (2022). A literature review and integrated framework for the determinants of crowdfunding success. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00345-6

Deng, X. N., Joshi, K. D., & Galliers, R. D. (2016). The Duality of Empowerment and Marginalization in Microtask Crowdsourcing: Giving Voice to the Less Powerful Through Value Sensitive Design1. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 40(2), 279-302. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.01

Dikaputra, R., Sulung, L. A. K., & Kot, S. (2019). Analysis of Success Factors of Reward-Based Crowdfunding Campaigns Using Multi-Theory Approach in ASEAN-5 Countries. Social Sciences, 8(10), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8100293

Drover, W., Busenitz, L., Matusik, S., Townsend, D., Anglin, A., & Dushnitsky, G. (2017). A Review and Road Map of Entrepreneurial Equity Financing Research: Venture Capital, Corporate Venture Capital, Angel Investment, Crowdfunding, and Accelerators. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1820-1853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317690584

Elrashidy, Z., Haniffa, R., Sherif, M., & Baroudi, S. (2024). Determinants of reward crowdfunding success: Evidence from Covid-19 pandemic. Technovation, 132, 102985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102985

Etter, V., Grossglauser, M., & Thiran, P. (2013). Launch hard or go home!: Predicting the success of kickstarter campaigns. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Online Social Networks, 177-182. https://doi.org/10.1145/2512938.2512957

Gerber, E. M., Hui, J. S., & Kuo, P. Y. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. In Proceedings of the international workshop on design, influence, and social technologies: techniques, impacts and ethics, 2(11).

Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed). Pearson.

Hobbs, J., Grigore, G., & Molesworth, M. (2016). Success in the management of crowdfunding projects in the creative industries. Internet Research, 26(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-08-2014-0202

Hong, Y., Hu, Y., & Burtch, G. (2018). Embeddedness, Prosociality, and Social Influence: Evidence from Online Crowdfunding1. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), 1211-1224. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/14105

Hörisch, J. (2018). “Think big” or “small is beautiful”? An empirical analysis of characteristics and determinants of success of sustainable crowdfunding projects. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.090982

Hui, Y., Wong, W. K., Bai, Z., & Zhu, Z. Z. (2017). A new nonlinearity test to circumvent the limitation of Volterra expansion with application. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 46, 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2016.11.006

Jiang, H., Wang, Z., Yang, L., Shen, J., & Hahn, J. (2021). How Rewarding Are Your Rewards? A Value-Based View of Crowdfunding Rewards and Crowdfunding Performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(3), 562-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720928922

Jolliffe, I. T. (1986). Choosing a Subset of Principal Components or Variables. Principal Component Analysis (pp. 92-114). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1904-8_6

Kennedy, P. (2011). A guide to econometrics (6th ed). Blackwell Pub.

Kim, T., Por, M. H., & Yang, S.-B. (2017). Winning the crowd in online fundraising platforms: The roles of founder and project features. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 25, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2017.09.002

Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile Regression (Econometric Society Monographs, Vol. 38). Cambridge University Press.

Koenker, R., & Hallock, K. F. (2001). Quantile Regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.143

Köhn, A. (2018). The determinants of startup valuation in the venture capital context: A systematic review and avenues for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 68(1), 3-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0131-5

Kraus, S., Richter, C., Brem, A., Cheng, C.-F., & Chang, M.-L. (2016). Strategies for reward-based crowdfunding campaigns. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 1(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.010

Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2018). Crowdfunding Creative Ideas: The Dynamics of Project Backers. In D. Cumming & L. Hornuf (Eds.), The Economics of Crowdfunding (pp. 151-182). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66119-3_8

Laachach, A., Sadighha, J., & Azza, Y. (2025). Integrating co-creation into crowdfunding: A comprehensive model for internet users’ intention to participate in tourism projects. Tourism and Hospitality Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584251361234

Lagazio, C., & Querci, F. (2018). Exploring the multi-sided nature of crowdfunding campaign success. Journal of Business Research, 90, 318-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.031

Lelo De Larrea, G., Altin, M., & Singh, D. (2019). Determinants of success of restaurant crowdfunding. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78, 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.10.003

Lin, Y., Lee, W.-C., & Chang, C.-C. H. (2016). Analysis of rewards on reward-based crowdfunding platforms. 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 501-504. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2016.7752281

Liu, Y., Chen, Y., & Fan, Z.-P. (2021). Do social network crowds help fundraising campaigns? Effects of social influence on crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Research, 122, 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.052

Makarova, S., & Ulitina, D. (2022). Determinants of Successful Crowdfunding Campaigns: Evidence from Russian Crowdfunding Platform Boomstarter. Journal of Corporate Finance Research ISSN: 2073-0438, 16(3), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.16.3.2022.95-110

Martínez-Gómez, C., Jiménez-Jiménez, F., & Alba-Fernández, M. V. (2020). Determinants of Overfunding in Equity Crowdfunding: An Empirical Study in the UK and Spain. Sustainability, 12(23), 10054. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310054

Mitra, T., & Gilbert, E. (2014). The language that gets people to give: Phrases that predict success on kickstarter. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531656

Mohammadi, N., & Sakhteh, S. (2023). Start-up accelerator value chain: A systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 73(2), 661-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00257-2

Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005

Mora-Cruz, A., & Palos-Sanchez, P. R. (2023). Crowdfunding platforms: A systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 19(3),1257-1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00856-3

Nardo, M., & Saisana, M. (2008). OECD/JRC handbook on constructing composite indicators. Putting theory into practice. In Proceedings of the NTTS (New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics) Seminar (p. 16).

Ngek, N. B., & van Aardt Smit, A. (2013). Will promoting more typical SME start-ups increase job creation in South Africa? African Journal of Business Management, 7(31), 3043-3051. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM12.1370

Peng, L., & Zhang, L. (2025). Unleashing the Crowd: The Effect of Social Networks in Crowdfunding Markets. Management Science, 71(6), 4942-4976. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01364

Petitjean, M. (2018). What explains the success of reward-based crowdfunding campaigns as they unfold? Evidence from the French crowdfunding platform KissKissBankBank. Finance Research Letters, 26, 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.11.005

Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664-683. https://doi.org/10.2307/420517

Roma, P., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Perrone, G. (2017). From the crowd to the market: The role of reward-based crowdfunding performance in attracting professional investors. Research Policy, 46(9), 1606-1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.012

Roma, P., Vasi, M., & Kolympiris, C. (2021). On the signaling effect of reward-based crowdfunding: (When) do later stage venture capitalists rely more on the crowd than their peers? Research Policy, 50(6), 104267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104267

Schwienbacher, A., & Larralde, B. (2012). Alternative Types Of Entrepreneurial Finance. In D. Cumming (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurial Finance (pp. 369–391). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195391244.013.0013

Skirnevskiy, V., Bendig, D., & Brettel, M. (2017). The Influence of Internal Social Capital on Serial Creators’ Success in Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 209-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12272

Spence, M. (1978). Job market signaling. In P. Diamond & M. Rothschild (Eds.), Uncertainty in economics: Readings and exercises (pp. 283-306). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-214850-7.50025-5

Thürridl, C., & Kamleitner, B. (2016). What Goes around Comes Around? Rewards as Strategic Assets in Crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2), 88-110. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.88

Tibshirani, R. J., & Efron, B. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Monographs on statistics and applied probability, 57(1), 1-436.

Tseng, J. (2025). Factors and quantile differences influencing funding volumes of successful crowdfunding campaigns on reward-based platforms in developed, developing, and emerging crowdfunding markets. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 104, 102070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2025.102070

Wang, Z., Li, H., & Law, R. (2017). Determinants of Tourism Crowdfunding Performance: An Empirical Study. Tourism Analysis, 22(3), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.3727/108354217X14955605216078

Wheat, R. E., Wang, Y., Byrnes, J. E., & Ranganathan, J. (2013). Raising money for scientific research through crowdfunding. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(2), 71-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.11.001

Williams, B. (2020). Nonparametric identification of discrete choice models with lagged dependent variables. Journal of Econometrics, 215(1), 286-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.08.005

Wong, W. K., Cheng, Y., & Yue, M. (2024). Could regression of stationary series be spurious? Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 2440017. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217595924400177

Wu, S., Wang, B., & Li, Y. (2015). How to attract the crowd in crowdfunding? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 24(3), 322. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2015.067465

Xu, A., Yang, X., Rao, H., Fu, W.-T., Huang, S.-W., & Bailey, B. P. (2014). Show me the money!: An analysis of project updates during crowdfunding campaigns. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 591-600. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557045

Yeh, T.-L., Chen, T.-Y., & Lee, C.-C. (2019). Investigating the funding success factors affecting reward-based crowdfunding projects. Innovation, 21(3), 466-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1585191

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302

Zhang, H., & Chen, W. (2019). Crowdfunding technological innovations: Interaction between consumer benefits and rewards. Technovation, 84, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.001

Zhang, X., Lyu, H., & Luo, J. (2021). What Contributes to a Crowdfunding Campaign’s Success? Evidence and Analyses from GoFundMe Data. Journal of Social Computing, 2(2), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.23919/JSC.2021.0010

Zheng, H., Li, D., Wu, J., & Xu, Y. (2014). The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US. Information & Management, 51(4), 488-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.03.003

Published

2026-03-28

How to Cite

Dridi, I., Gafrej, O., & Salhi, J. (2026). Determinants of Reward Crowdfunding Success for Technology Projects: The Moderating Role of Platform Age. Advances in Decision Sciences, 30(2), 68-113. https://doi.org/10.47654/v30y2026i2p68-113