Data-Driven Decision Optimization of Humic and Fulvic Acid Treatments: Experimental Evidence on Enzyme Regulation and Nutrient Bioavailability in Calcareous Soils
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47654/v29y2025i3p158-187Keywords:
Humic acid, Fulvic acid, Soil enzyme, Nutrient bioavailability, Calcareous soilAbstract
Purpose: This study explores the influence of humic and fulvic acids on soil enzymatic activities and nutrient bioavailability in calcareous soils, aiming to enhance understanding of their environmental roles in soil management and fertility.
Design/methodology/approach: Four humic substances—fulvic acid (FA), OMRI, SP85, and HS—were applied at varying concentrations (0–1000 mg·kg⁻¹) to calcareous soils. Enzymatic activities (urease, phosphodiesterase, acid and alkaline phosphatase) and the bioavailability of key nutrients (P, K, NH₄⁺, Mg, Ca, Cu, Zn) were assessed after 40 and 70 days.
Findings: Humic substances significantly affected soil enzymatic processes and nutrient availability. Urease activity was consistently inhibited, with the strongest effect observed under SP85. Phosphodiesterase and phosphatase activities were notably enhanced, especially under FA and HS treatments. Optimal phosphatase activity was observed at 800 mg·kg⁻¹, while excessive concentrations (e.g., 1000 mg·kg⁻¹ of SP85) led to decreased activity. HS treatment induced the greatest increase in phosphomonoesterase activity by day 70. Nutrient responses varied: OMRI improved P and Mg availability; HS increased K and Zn; FA promoted Cu. Calcium levels declined under all humic acid treatments. An application rate of 400 mg·kg⁻¹ was found to be optimal.
Practical implications: Appropriate application of humic substances can improve soil biochemical health, supporting efficient nutrient management in high-pH soils.
Originality/value: This study provides novel insights into the enzyme–nutrient interactions influenced by humic substances in calcareous soils. This study also contributes to Decision Sciences by providing a data-driven optimization framework for selecting the most effective type and concentration of humic substances to support evidence-based agricultural decision-making. This research is original in integrating soil biochemical experimentation with quantitative decision modeling, allowing readers to see how data-driven optimization links biological evidence with managerial decision-support. Academics may cite this paper for its methodological synthesis of experimental design and optimization analysis, while practitioners can adopt its findings to enhance real-world nutrient-management efficiency in calcareous soils.
References
Alemayehu, Y., Salimath, S. B., Thippeshappa, G. N., Ganapathi, G., Nandish, M. S., & Mallikarjuna, H. B. (2022). Liquid bioformulation regulates soil microbial and enzymatic activities, and nutrient dynamics in drip-irrigated aerobic rice. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 53(22), 3008-3028.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2100899
Amoozad, N., & Zahedi, M. (2024). Effects of humic acid application on physiological and biochemical characteristics of safflower cultivars under salinity and cadmium contamination. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 27(5), 651-661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-024-00258-z
Arancon, N. Q., Edwards, C. A., Lee, S., & Byrne, R. (2006). Effects of humic acids from vermicomposts on plant growth. European journal of soil biology, 42, S65–S69.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.06.004
Baigorri, R., Fuentes, M., González-Gaitano, G., García-Mina, J. M., Almendros, G., & González-Vila, F. J. (2009). Complementary multianalytical approach to study the distinctive structural features of the main humic fractions in solution: Gray humic acid, brown humic acid, and fulvic acid. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57(8), 3266–3272.https://doi.org/10.1021/jf8035353
Bremner, J. M., & Douglas, L. A. (1973). Effects of some urease inhibitors on urea hydrolysis in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 37(2), 225–226.https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1973.03615995003700020020x
Browman, M. G., & Tabatabai, M. A. (1978). Phosphodiesterase activity of soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42, 284–290.
Calvo, P., Nelson, L., & Kloepper, J. W. (2014). Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant and soil, 383(1), 3-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8
Canellas, L. P., Olivares, F. L., Aguiar, N. O., Jones, D. L., Nebbioso, A., Mazzei, P., & Piccolo, A. (2015). Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Scientia horticulturae, 196, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013
Cavusoglu, M. N., Turkoglu, N., & Ozdemir, F. A. (2017). The effects of phosphorus and humic acid on some soil properties and flower quality of Gladiolus. Progress in Nutrition, 19, 150–155.https://doi.org/10.23751/PN.V19I1-S.5822
Chen, Y., Clapp, C., & Magen, H. (2004). Mechanisms of plant growth stimulation by humic substances: The role of organo-iron complexes. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 50(7), 1089–1095.https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2004.10408579
Cheng, Y., Hui, Y., Liu, S., & Wong, W. K. (2022). Could significant regression be treated as insignificant: An anomaly in statistics?. Communications in Statistics: Case Studies, Data Analysis and Applications, 8(1), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/23737484.2021.1986171
Cheng, Y., Hui, Y., McAleer, M., & Wong, W. K. (2021). Spurious relationships for nearly non-stationary series. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(8), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14080366
Doskočil, L., Grasset, L., Válková, D., & Pekař, M. (2014). Hydrogen peroxide oxidation of humic acids and lignite. Fuel, 134, 406–413.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.011
Eivazi, F., & Tabatabai, M. A. (1977). Phosphatases in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 9, 167–172.
Erhayem, M., & Sohn, M. (2013). Effect of humic acid source on humic acid adsorption onto titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Science of the Total Environment, 470, 92–98.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.063
Fernández-Escobar, R., Benlloch, M., Barranco, D., Dueñas, A., & Gañán, J. G. (1996). Response of olive trees to foliar application of humic substances extracted from leonardite. Scientia Horticulturae, 66(3–4), 191–200.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(96)00914-4
Gómez-Sagasti, M. T., Alkorta, I., Becerril, J. M., Epelde, L., Anza, M., & Garbisu, C. (2012). Microbial monitoring of the recovery of soil quality during heavy metal phytoremediation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 223(6), 3249-3262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1106-8
Hui, Y., Wong, W. K., Bai, Z., & Zhu, Z. Z. (2017). A new nonlinearity test to circumvent the limitation of Volterra expansion with application. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 46, 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2016.11.006
Hwang, J. E., Jegal, J., & Lee, K. H. (2002). Separation of humic acid with nanofiltration polyamide composite membranes. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 86(11), 2847–2853.https://doi.org/10.1002/app.11258
Klucakova, M. (2014). Complexation of metal ions with solid humic acids, humic colloidal solutions, and humic hydrogel. Environmental Engineering Science, 31(11), 612–620.https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2013.0487
Kumari, U., Pankaj, & Yadav, S. (2023). Microbial Transformations of Lead: Perspectives for Biological Removal of Lead from Soil. In Lead Toxicity: Challenges and Solution (pp. 287-308). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37327-5_13
Lamar, R. T., & Talbot, K. H. (2009). Critical comparison of humic acid test methods. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 40, 2309–2322.https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620903111251
Li, H., Li, Y., & Li, C. (2013). Characterization of humic acids and fulvic acids derived from sewage sludge. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 25(18), 10087–10091.https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2013.15162
Lumactud, R. A., Gorim, L. Y., & Thilakarathna, M. S. (2022). Impacts of humic-based products on the microbial community structure and functions toward sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 977121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.977121
Maffia, A., Oliva, M., Marra, F., Mallamaci, C., Nardi, S., & Muscolo, A. (2025). Humic substances: Bridging ecology and agriculture for a greener future. Agronomy, 15(2), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15020410
Martyniuk, H., & Wieckowska, J. (2003). Adsorption of metal ions on humic acids extracted from brown coals. Fuel Processing Technology, 84, 3–36.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(02)00246-1
Mu, D., Yang, H., Gao, W., Zhao, J., Wang, L., Wang, F., ... & Wei, Z. (2025). Nuclear magnetic resonance revealed the structural unit difference and polymerization process of pre-humic acid from different organic waste sources. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 304, 140457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140457
Nannipieri, P., Ascher, J., Ceccherini, M., Landi, L., Pietramellara, G., & Renella, G. (2017). Microbial diversity and soil functions. European journal of soil science, 68(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.4_12398
Sabah, E., & Ouki, S. (2017). Sepiolite and sepiolite-bound humic acid interactions in alkaline media and the mechanism of the formation of sepiolite-humic acid complexes. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 162, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2017.03.005
Sachs, S., Reich, T., & Bernhard, G. (2010). Study of the role of sulfur functionalities in humic acids for uranium(VI) complexation. Radiochimica Acta, 98(8), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2010.1746
Schmeide, K., Sachs, S., & Bernhard, G. (2012). Np(V) reduction by humic acid: Contribution of reduced sulfur functionalities to the redox behavior of humic acid. Science of the Total Environment, 419, 116–123.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.052
Schmidt, M. W., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G., Janssens, I. A., ... & Trumbore, S. E. (2011). Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature, 478(7367), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10386
Schnitzer, M. (1986). Binding of humic substances by soil mineral colloids. Interactions of soil minerals with natural organics and microbes, 17, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub17.c4
Shahbazi, K., Marzi, M., & Tabakhian, S. (2019). The comparative evaluation of humic acid determining methods in humic-based commercial fertilizers. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 65(12), 1720–1732.https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1575511
Shan, B., Hao, R., Zhang, J., Li, J., Ye, Y., & Lu, A. (2023). Microbial remediation mechanisms and applications for lead-contaminated environments. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 39(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-022-03484-1
Shnitzer, M., & Khan, S. U. (1972). Humic substances in the environment.
Stefanova, M., Gonsalvesh, L. N., Marinov, S., Czech, J., Carleer, R., & Yperman, J. (2014). Reductive pyrolysis of leonardite humic acids. Bulgarian Chemical Communications, 46(1), 123–128.
Stevenson, F. J. (1994). Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. John Wiley & Sons.
Swift, R. S. (1999). Macromolecular properties of soil humic substances: fact, fiction, and opinion. Soil science, 164(11), 790-802.
Szabó, L. P. (2004). Characterization of alginite humic acid content. Desalination, 163, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(04)90180-4
Tabatabai, M. A., & Bremner, J. M. (1969). Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1, 301–307.https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1
Tan, K. H. (2003). Humic matter in soil and the environment: principles and controversies. CRC press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203912546
Vrantsi, E., Lakka, A., Bozinou, E., Athanasiadis, V., Papadaki, E. S., Dourtoglou, V. G., & Lalas, S. I. (2021). Humic and fulvic acids as specific sorbents of herbicides in water. Clean – Soil, Air, Water, 49(11), Article 2000467.https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.202000467
Wang, W., Yang, H., Wang, X., Jiang, J., & Zhu, W. (2010). Effects of fulvic acid and humic acid on aluminum speciation in drinking water. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 22(2), 211–217.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60095-4
Wang, Y., & Fujii, T. (2011). Evaluation of methods of determining humic acids in nucleic acid samples for molecular biological analysis. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 75(2), 355–357.https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.100597
Withers, E., Hill, P. W., Chadwick, D. R., & Jones, D. L. (2020). Use of untargeted metabolomics for assessing soil quality and microbial function. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 143, 107758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107758
Wong, W. K., Cheng, Y., & Yue, M. (2024). Could regression of stationary series be spurious?. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217595924400177
Wong, W. K., & Pham, M. T. (2025). Could the correlation of a stationary series with a non-stationary series obtain meaningful outcomes?. Annals of Financial Economics, first revision. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5746563
Wong, W. K., & Yue, M. (2024). Could regressing a stationary series on a non-stationary series obtain meaningful outcomes?. Annals of Financial Economics, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010495224500118
Wu, X., Liu, P., Gong, Z., Wang, H., Huang, H., Shi, Y., ... & Gao, S. (2021). Humic acid and fulvic acid hinder long-term weathering of microplastics in lake water. Environmental science & technology, 55(23), 15810-15820.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04501
Zantua, M. I., & Bremner, J. M. (1975). Comparison of methods of assaying urease activity in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 7, 291–295.https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(75)90069-3
Zara, M., Ahmad, Z., Akhtar, J., Shahzad, K., Sheikh, N., & Munir, S. (2017). Extraction and characterization of humic acid from Pakistani lignite coals. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 39(11), 1159–1166.https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2017.1307886
Zhang, J., Zhan, S., Zhong, L. B., Wang, X., Qiu, Z., & Zheng, Y. M. (2023). Adsorption of typical natural organic matter on microplastics in aqueous solution: Kinetics, isotherm, influence factors and mechanism. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 443, 130130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130130
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Advances in Decision Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Scientific and Business World